68
6. We have nothing to report on the other information in the
Annual Report (continued)
We are also required to review the Viability statement, set out
on page 38 under the Listing Rules. Based on the above
procedures, we have concluded that the above disclosures are
materially consistent with the financial statements and our audit
knowledge.
Our work is limited to assessing these matters in the context of
only the knowledge acquired during our financial statements
audit. As we cannot predict all future events or conditions and as
subsequent events may result in outcomes that are inconsistent
with judgements that were reasonable at the time they were
made, the absence of anything to report on these statements is
not a guarantee as to the Company’s longer-term viability.
Corporate governance disclosures
We are required to perform procedures to identify whether
there is a material inconsistency between the Directors’
corporate governance disclosures and the financial statements
and our audit knowledge.
Based on those procedures, we have concluded that each of the
following is materially consistent with the financial statements
and our audit knowledge:
— the Directors’ statement that they consider that the annual
report and financial statements taken as a whole is fair,
balanced and understandable, and provides the information
necessary for shareholders to assess the Company’s position
and performance, business model and strategy;
— the section of the annual report describing the work of the
Audit and Risk Committee, including the significant issues
that the Audit and Risk Committee considered in relation to
the financial statements, and how these issues were
addressed; and
— the section of the annual report that describes the review of
the effectiveness of the Company’s risk management and
internal control systems.
We are required to review the part of the Corporate Governance
Statement relating to the Company’s compliance with the
provisions of the UK Corporate Governance Code specified by the
Listing Rules for our review. We have nothing to report in this
respect.
7. We have nothing to report on the other matters on which
we are required to report by exception
Under the Companies Act 2006, we are required to report to you
if, in our opinion:
— adequate accounting records have not been kept, or returns
adequate for our audit have not been received from
branches not visited by us; or
— the financial statements and the part of the Directors’
Remuneration Report to be audited are not in agreement
with the accounting records and
returns; or
— certain disclosures of directors’ remuneration specified by
law are not made; or
— we have not received all the information and explanations
we require for our audit.
We have nothing to report in these respects.
8. Respective responsibilities
Directors’ responsibilities
As explained more fully in their statement set out on page 63,
the directors are responsible for: the preparation of the financial
statements including being satisfied that they give a true and fair
view; such internal control as they determine is necessary to
enable the preparation of financial statements that are free from
material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error; assessing
the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern, disclosing,
as applicable, matters related to going concern; and using the
going concern basis of accounting unless they either intend to
liquidate the Company or to cease operations, or have no
realistic alternative but to do so.
Auditor’s responsibilities
Our objectives are to obtain reasonable assurance about whether
the financial statements as a whole are free from material
misstatement, whether due to fraud or error, and to issue our
opinion in an auditor’s report. Reasonable assurance is a high
level of assurance, but does not guarantee that an audit
conducted in accordance with ISAs (UK) will always detect a
material misstatement when it exists. Misstatements can arise
from fraud or error and are considered material if, individually or
in aggregate, they could reasonably be expected to influence the
economic decisions of users taken on the basis of the financial
statements.
A fuller description of our responsibilities is provided on the
FRC’s website at www.frc.org.uk/auditorsresponsibilities.
In accordance with Disclosure Guidance and Transparency Rule
4.1.14R, the financial statements will form part of the annual
financial report prepared using the single electronic reporting
format under the TD ESEF Regulation. The auditor's report on
these financial statements provides no assurance over the ESEF
format
9. The purpose of our audit work and to whom we owe our
responsibilities
This report is made solely to the Company’s members, as a body,
in accordance with Chapter 3 of Part 16 of the Companies Act
2006. Our audit work has been undertaken so that we might
state to the Company’s members those matters we are required
to state to them in an auditor’s report and for no other purpose.
To the fullest extent permitted by law, we do not accept or
assume responsibility to anyone other than the Company and the
Company’s members, as a body, for our audit work, for this
report, or for the opinions we have formed.
John Waterson (Senior Statutory Auditor)
for and on behalf of KPMG LLP, Statutory Auditor
Chartered Accountants
Saltire Court
20 Castle Terrace
Edinburgh
EH1 2EG
17 June 2022
5. Fraud and breaches of laws and regulations – ability to detect
(continued)
Identifying and responding to risks of material misstatement
due to non-compliance with laws and regulations (continued)
Firstly, the Company is subject to laws and regulations that directly
affect the financial statements including financial reporting
legislation (including related companies legislation), distributable
profits legislation, and its qualification as an Investment Trust
under UK taxation legislation, any breach of which could lead to the
Company losing various deductions and exemptions from UK
corporation tax, and we assessed the extent of compliance with
these laws and regulations as part of our procedures on the related
financial statement items.
Secondly, the Company is subject to many other laws and
regulations where the consequences of non-compliance could have
a material effect on amounts or disclosures in the financial
statements, for instance through the imposition of fines or
litigation. We identified the following areas as those most likely to
have such an effect: money laundering, data protection, bribery
and corruption legislation and certain aspects of company
legislation recognising the financial and regulated nature of the
Company’s activities and its legal form. Auditing standards limit the
required audit procedures to identify non-compliance with these
laws and regulations to enquiry of the Directors and the
Administrator and inspection of regulatory and legal
correspondence, if any. Therefore if a breach of operational
regulations is not disclosed to us or evident from relevant
correspondence, an audit will not detect that breach.
Context of the ability of the audit to detect fraud or breaches of
law or regulation
Owing to the inherent limitations of an audit, there is an
unavoidable risk that we may not have detected some material
misstatements in the financial statements, even though we have
properly planned and performed our audit in accordance with
auditing standards. For example, the further removed non-
compliance with laws and regulations is from the events and
transactions reflected in the financial statements, the less likely the
inherently limited procedures required by auditing standards
would identify it.
In addition, as with any audit, there remained a higher risk of non-
detection of fraud, as these may involve collusion, forgery,
intentional omissions, misrepresentations, or the override of
internal controls. Our audit procedures are designed to detect
material misstatement. We are not responsible for preventing non-
compliance or fraud and cannot be expected to detect non-
compliance with all laws and regulations.
6. We have nothing to report on the other information in the
Annual Report
The Directors are responsible for the other information
presented in the Annual Report together with the financial
statements. Our opinion on the financial statements does not
cover the other information and, accordingly, we do not express
an audit opinion or, except as explicitly stated below, any form of
assurance conclusion thereon.
Our responsibility is to read the other information and, in doing
so, consider whether, based on our financial statements audit
work, the information therein is materially misstated or
inconsistent with the financial statements or our audit
knowledge. Based solely on that work we have not identified
material misstatements in the other information.
Strategic report and directors’ report
Based solely on our work on the other information:
— we have not identified material misstatements in the
strategic report and the Directors’ report;
— in our opinion the information given in those reports for the
financial year is consistent with the financial statements; and
— in our opinion those reports have been prepared in
accordance with the Companies Act 2006.
Directors’ remuneration report
In our opinion the part of the Directors’ Remuneration Report to
be audited has been properly prepared in accordance with the
Companies Act 2006.
Disclosures of emerging and principal risks and longer-term
viability
We are required to perform procedures to identify whether
there is a material inconsistency between the Directors’
disclosures in respect of emerging and principal risks and the
viability statement, and the financial statements and our audit
knowledge.
Based on those procedures, we have nothing material to add or
draw attention to in relation to:
— the Directors’ confirmation within the Strategic Report on
page 36 that they have carried out a robust assessment of
the emerging and principal risks facing the Company,
including those that would threaten its business model,
future performance, solvency and liquidity;
— the Principal Risks and Risk Mitigation disclosures describing
these risks and how emerging risks are identified, and
explaining how they are being managed and mitigated; and
— the Directors’ explanation in the Viability Statement of how
they have assessed the prospects of the Company, over what
period they have done so and why they considered that
period to be appropriate, and their statement as to whether
they have a reasonable expectation that the Company will be
able to continue in operation and meet its liabilities as they
fall due over the period of their assessment, including any
related disclosures drawing attention to any necessary
qualifications or assumptions.